Foundation Sprints
Sign in

Direction · 1 of 12

Opportunity

Whether this is worth building at all — the tensions in the market, the problem at the heart of it, and why now is the moment.

Sounds like what you need?

  • Find out whether people would actually pay for it
  • Map who else is out there and where the gap is
  • Pin down why now is the moment for this
  • Work out who wants this most
  • Show the idea, not just describe it

What the Direction Sprint looks like

The questions this sprint answers

  • What problem are we actually solving, and for whom does it hurt most?
  • Who is the one person we're building this for first?
  • What's our point of view on how things should be?
  • What's the core job someone hires this for?

Decisions we'll make together

  • Whether it's worth building, and for whom first
  • The one opportunity to go after
  • Who the first customer is
  • What they need most from you

Your week

  1. MonWorkshop — We confirm the scope, check the foundation, and agree what we're testing and how.
  2. TueExplore — Two or three directions for opportunity, audience, positioning and job.
  3. WedDirection lock — We review the directions together and choose one.
  4. ThuMake — The chosen direction, built out.
  5. FriDelivery — A walkthrough, and everything lands in your Hub.

You leave with: A competitive 2x2 · An opportunity brief · Personas · Their words for the problem · A positioning statement · Your promise and personality · Job & scope · A "won't do" list

Every sprint follows this shape; yours is written around your project when you start.

In a real project

Miles

What opportunity produced in a real engagement, exactly as the client has it. See the whole Hub

Category map

Competitive 2x2

Calm, human

Watches the driver
Miles
Garmin Dash Cams
Rove
Viofo
Vantrue
BlackVue
Life360
Bouncie
Progressive Snapshot
Backs the driver

Loud, spec-driven

Observations & key tensions

What we heard and saw, before deciding anything

  • Parents want to know a new driver is safe — and don't want to become the person who polices every trip.
  • Teens are the highest-risk drivers, and they already expect to be blamed: "afraid we'll be blamed for accidents."
  • The category splits in two. Dash cams (Rove, Vantrue, Viofo, BlackVue) are loud, spec-driven and surveillance-toned; trackers and insurance apps (Life360, Bouncie, Snapshot) keep score.
  • New cars raise awareness through their OEM apps, but they're complicated and lock you in — older cars get nothing.
Read more

Tensions to hold rather than resolve

  • Visibility vs. privacy — the parent's peace of mind can't cost the teen's dignity.
  • Helpful vs. overkill — more data reads as more surveillance, not more care.
  • Serious vs. approachable — it has to be trusted with safety without sounding like a warning label.

Problem statement & why now

Problem

Parents of new drivers have two options: know nothing, or monitor everything.

Both damage the relationship — one with worry, the other with suspicion — and neither makes the teen a better driver.

Why now

  • OBD-II hardware makes rich trip data cheap to collect from almost any car on the road, not just new ones.
  • Insurers have trained families to see driving data as a score to be judged by — which leaves the supportive version of it unclaimed.
  • Short-form video has made new-driver anxiety visible; teens arrive at their license already nervous.

Opportunity framing

If driving data can be turned from a score into a conversation, Miles owns the space between "no idea" and "surveillance": the calm, human corner of the category that nobody currently occupies.

Success looks like families describing Miles as the thing that made the new-driver year less stressful — not as a tracker.

Kickoff category notes

Dash cams (Rove, Vantrue, Viofo) read loud and spec-driven; trackers and insurance apps keep score.

The calm, human corner is open.